CA1 pyramidal neuron: Persistent Na current mediates steep synaptic amplification (Hsu et al 2018)

 Download zip file 
Help downloading and running models
Accession:240960
This paper shows that persistent sodium current critically contributes to the subthreshold nonlinear dynamics of CA1 pyramidal neurons and promotes rapidly reversible conversion between place-cell and silent-cell in the hippocampus. A simple model built with realistic axo-somatic voltage-gated sodium channels in CA1 (Carter et al., 2012; Neuron 75, 1081–1093) demonstrates that the biophysics of persistent sodium current is sufficient to explain the synaptic amplification effects. A full model built previously (Grienberger et al., 2017; Nature Neuroscience, 20(3): 417–426) with detailed morphology, ion channel types and biophysical properties of CA1 place cells naturally reproduces the steep voltage dependence of synaptic responses.
Reference:
1 . Hsu CL, Zhao X, Milstein AD, Spruston N (2018) Persistent sodium current mediates the steep voltage dependence of spatial coding in hippocampal pyramidal neurons Neuron 99:1-16
Citations  Citation Browser
Model Information (Click on a link to find other models with that property)
Model Type: Synapse; Channel/Receptor; Neuron or other electrically excitable cell; Axon; Dendrite;
Brain Region(s)/Organism: Hippocampus;
Cell Type(s): Hippocampus CA1 pyramidal GLU cell; Abstract single compartment conductance based cell;
Channel(s): I Sodium; I A; I M; I h; I K;
Gap Junctions:
Receptor(s): AMPA; NMDA;
Gene(s):
Transmitter(s): Glutamate;
Simulation Environment: NEURON;
Model Concept(s): Ion Channel Kinetics; Membrane Properties; Synaptic Integration; Synaptic Amplification; Place cell/field; Active Dendrites; Conductance distributions; Detailed Neuronal Models; Electrotonus; Markov-type model;
Implementer(s): Hsu, Ching-Lung [hsuc at janelia.hhmi.org]; Milstein, Aaron D. [aaronmil at stanford.edu];
Search NeuronDB for information about:  Hippocampus CA1 pyramidal GLU cell; AMPA; NMDA; I A; I K; I M; I h; I Sodium; Glutamate;
/
HsuEtAl2018
FullModel
data
morphologies
README.md
ampa_kin.mod *
exp2EPSC.mod
gaba_a_kin.mod *
h.mod
kad.mod *
kap.mod *
kdr.mod *
km2.mod
nas.mod
nax.mod
nmda_kin5.mod *
pr.mod *
vecevent.mod *
batch_nap_EPSC_amplification.sh
batch_nap_EPSP_amplification.sh
batch_nap_EPSP_amplification_IO.sh
function_lib.py
install notes.txt
plot_nap_EPSC_amplification.py
plot_nap_EPSP_amplification.py
plot_nap_EPSP_amplification_IO.py
plot_results.py
simulate_nap_EPSC_amplification.py
simulate_nap_EPSP_amplification.py
simulate_nap_EPSP_amplification_IO.py
specify_cells.py
visualize_ion_channel_gating_parameters.py
                            
COMMENT

Adapted exp2syn to generate a current rather than a conductance (Milstein 2015):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Two state kinetic scheme synapse described by rise time tau1,
and decay time constant tau2. The normalized peak current is 1.
Decay time MUST be greater than rise time.

The solution of A->G->bath with rate constants 1/tau1 and 1/tau2 is
 A = a*exp(-t/tau1) and
 G = a*tau2/(tau2-tau1)*(-exp(-t/tau1) + exp(-t/tau2))
	where tau1 < tau2

If tau2-tau1 -> 0 then we have a alphasynapse.
and if tau1 -> 0 then we have just single exponential decay.

The factor is evaluated in the
initial block such that an event of weight 1 generates a
peak conductance of 1.

Because the solution is a sum of exponentials, the
coupled equations can be solved as a pair of independent equations
by the more efficient cnexp method.

ENDCOMMENT

NEURON {
	POINT_PROCESS EPSC
	RANGE tau1, tau2, i, inward, imax
	NONSPECIFIC_CURRENT i
}

UNITS {
	(nA) = (nanoamp)
	(mV) = (millivolt)
}

PARAMETER {
	tau1 = 0.2   (ms)    <1e-9,1e9>
	tau2 = 5.0    (ms)   <1e-9,1e9>
    inward = -1.0                     : for inward currents
    imax = 1.0           <0,1>        : to scale amplitude
}

ASSIGNED {
	v (mV)
	i (nA)
	factor
}

STATE {
	A (nA)
	B (nA)
}

INITIAL {
	LOCAL tp
	if (tau1/tau2 > .9999) {
		tau1 = .9999*tau2
	}
	A = 0
	B = 0
	tp = (tau1*tau2)/(tau2 - tau1) * log(tau2/tau1)
	factor = -exp(-tp/tau1) + exp(-tp/tau2)
	factor = 1/factor
}

BREAKPOINT {
	SOLVE state METHOD cnexp
	i = inward * imax * (B - A)
}

DERIVATIVE state {
	A' = -A/tau1
	B' = -B/tau2
}

NET_RECEIVE(weight (nA)) {
	A = A + weight*factor
    B = B + weight*factor
}