CA1 pyramidal neuron: as a 2-layer NN and subthreshold synaptic summation (Poirazi et al 2003)

 Download zip file   Auto-launch 
Help downloading and running models
Accession:20212
We developed a CA1 pyramidal cell model calibrated with a broad spectrum of in vitro data. Using simultaneous dendritic and somatic recordings, and combining results for two different response measures (peak vs. mean EPSP), two different stimulus formats (single shock vs. 50 Hz trains), and two different spatial integration conditions (within vs. between-branch summation), we found the cell's subthreshold responses to paired inputs are best described as a sum of nonlinear subunit responses, where the subunits correspond to different dendritic branches. In addition to suggesting a new type of experiment and providing testable predictions, our model shows how conclusions regarding synaptic arithmetic can be influenced by an array of seemingly innocuous experimental design choices.
Reference:
1 . Poirazi P, Brannon T, Mel BW (2003) Arithmetic of subthreshold synaptic summation in a model CA1 pyramidal cell. Neuron 37:977-87 [PubMed]
2 . Poirazi P, Brannon T, Mel BW (2003) Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network. Neuron 37:989-99 [PubMed]
3 . Poirazi P, Brannon T, Mel BW (2003ab-sup) Online Supplement: About the Model Neuron 37 Online:1-20
4 . Polsky A, Mel BW, Schiller J (2004) Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells. Nat Neurosci 7:621-7 [PubMed]
Citations  Citation Browser
Model Information (Click on a link to find other models with that property)
Model Type: Neuron or other electrically excitable cell;
Brain Region(s)/Organism:
Cell Type(s): Hippocampus CA1 pyramidal GLU cell;
Channel(s): I Na,p; I Na,t; I L high threshold; I T low threshold; I A; I K; I M; I h; I K,Ca; I Calcium;
Gap Junctions:
Receptor(s): GabaA; GabaB; NMDA; Glutamate;
Gene(s):
Transmitter(s):
Simulation Environment: NEURON;
Model Concept(s): Action Potential Initiation; Activity Patterns; Dendritic Action Potentials; Active Dendrites; Influence of Dendritic Geometry; Detailed Neuronal Models; Action Potentials; Depression; Delay;
Implementer(s): Poirazi, Panayiota [poirazi at imbb.forth.gr];
Search NeuronDB for information about:  Hippocampus CA1 pyramidal GLU cell; GabaA; GabaB; NMDA; Glutamate; I Na,p; I Na,t; I L high threshold; I T low threshold; I A; I K; I M; I h; I K,Ca; I Calcium;
/
CA1_multi
mechanism
not-currently-used
abbott.mod
abbott_nmda.mod
borgkm.mod
ca.mod
cachan.mod
cacum.mod
cad_trunk.mod
cad3.mod
cadecay.mod *
cadifusl.mod
cagk.mod
cal.mod
calH.mod
can2.mod
canKev.mod
capump.mod
cat.mod
h.mod
hh3.mod
hh3_flei.mod
hha.mod
ht.mod
ican.mod
iq.mod
it.mod
it1.mod
ITGHK.mod *
kad.mod *
kap.mod *
kc.mod
kca.mod
kdr.mod
kdr_inac.mod
kdrca1.mod
kv.mod *
My_cal.mod
My_can.mod
My_cat.mod
my_kca.mod
Myca.mod
Mykca.mod
na.mod *
na3.mod
namir.mod
nax.mod
ourca_old.mod
vkca.mod
abbott.o
abbott_nmda.c
h.pl
ITGHK.o
mod_func.c
test.hoc
test2.hoc
testh.hoc
VClamp.omod *
                            
TITLE anomalous rectifier channel
COMMENT
:
: Anomalous Rectifier Ih - cation (Na/K) channel in thalamocortical neurons
:
: Kinetic model of calcium-induced shift in the activation of Ih channels.
: Model of Destexhe et al., Biophys J. 65: 1538-1552, 1993, based on the
: voltage-clamp data on the calcium dependence of If in heart cells
: (Harigawa & Irisawa, J. Physiol. 409: 121, 1989)
:
: The voltage-dependence is derived from Huguenard & McCormick, 
: J Neurophysiol. 68: 1373-1383, 1992, based on voltage-clamp data of 
: McCormick & Pape, J. Physiol. 431: 291, 1990. 
:
: Modified model of the binding of calcium through a calcium-binding (CB)
: protein, which in turn acts on Ih channels.  This model was described in
: detail in the following reference:
:    Destexhe, A., Bal, T., McCormick, D.A. and Sejnowski, T.J.  Ionic 
:    mechanisms underlying synchronized oscillations and propagating waves
:    in a model of ferret thalamic slices. Journal of Neurophysiology 76:
:    2049-2070, 1996.  (see http://www.cnl.salk.edu/~alain)
:
:   KINETIC MODEL:
:
:         Normal voltage-dependent opening of Ih channels:
:
:               c1 (closed) <-> o1 (open)       ; rate cst alpha(V),beta(V)
:
:         Ca++ binding on CB protein
:
:               p0 (inactive) + nca Ca <-> p1 (active)  ; rate cst k1,k2
:
:         Binding of active CB protein on the open form (nexp binding sites) :
:
:               o1 (open) + nexp p1 <-> o2 (open)       ; rate cst k3,k4
:
:
:   PARAMETERS:
:       It is more useful to reformulate the parameters k1,k2 into
:       k2 and cac = (k2/k1)^(1/nca) = half activation calcium dependence, 
:       and idem for k3,k4 into k4 and Pc = (k4/k3)^(1/nexp) = half activation
:       of Ih binding (this is like dealing with tau_m and m_inf instead of
:       alpha and beta in Hodgkin-Huxley equations)
:       - k2:   this rate constant is the inverse of the real time constant of 
:               the binding of Ca to the CB protein
:       - cac:  the half activation (affinity) of the CB protein;
:               around 1 to 10 microM.  
:       - k4:   this rate constant is the inverse of the real time constant of 
:               the binding of the CB protein to Ih channels
:               very low: it basically governs the interspindle period
:       - Pc:   the half activation (affinity) of the Ih channels for the
:               CB protein;
:       - nca:  number of binding sites of calcium on CB protein; usually 4
:       - nexp: number of binding sites on Ih channels
:       - ginc: augmentation of conductance associated with the Ca bound state
:         (about 2-3; see Harigawa & Hirisawa, 1989)
:
:
:   IMPORTANT REMARKS:
:       - This simple model for the binding of Ca++ on the open channel 
:         suffies to account for the shift in the voltage-dependence of Ih
:         activation with calcium (see details in Destexhe et al, 1993).
:       - It may be that calcium just binds to the Ih channel, preventing the 
:         conformational change between open and closed; in this case one
:         should take into account binding on the closed state, which is 
:         neglected here.
:
:   MODIFICATIONS
:       - this file also contains a procedure ("activation") to estimate
:         the steady-state activation of the current; callable from outside
:       - the time constant now contains a changeable minimal value (taum)
:       - shift: new local variable to displace the voltage-dependence
:         (shift>0 -> depolarizing shift)
:
:
: Alain Destexhe, Salk Institute and Laval University, 1995
:
ENDCOMMENT

INDEPENDENT {t FROM 0 TO 1 WITH 1 (ms)}

NEURON {
        SUFFIX iar
        USEION h READ eh WRITE ih VALENCE 1
        USEION ca READ cai
        RANGE gbar, h_inf, tau_s, m, shift
        GLOBAL k2, cac, k4, Pc, nca, nexp, ginc, taum
}

UNITS {
        (molar) = (1/liter)
        (mM)    = (millimolar)
        (mA)    = (milliamp)
        (mV)    = (millivolt)
        (msM)   = (ms mM)
}


PARAMETER {
        eh      = -40   (mV)
        celsius = 36    (degC)
        gbar   = 2e-5 (mho/cm2)
        cac     = 0.002 (mM)            : half-activation of calcium dependence
        k2      = 0.0004 (1/ms)         : inverse of time constant
        Pc      = 0.01                  : half-activation of CB protein dependence
        k4      = 0.001 (1/ms)          : backward binding on Ih
        nca     = 4                     : number of binding sites of ca++
        nexp    = 1                     : number of binding sites on Ih channels
        ginc    = 2                     : augmentation of conductance with Ca++
        taum    = 20    (ms)            : min value of tau
        shift   = 0     (mV)            : shift of Ih voltage-dependence
}


STATE {
        c1      : closed state of channel
        o1      : open state
        o2      : CB-bound open state
        p0      : resting CB
        p1      : Ca++-bound CB
}


ASSIGNED {
        v       (mV)
        cai     (mM)
        ih      (mA/cm2)
        gh      (mho/cm2)
        h_inf
        tau_s   (ms)
        alpha   (1/ms)
        beta    (1/ms)
        k1ca    (1/ms)
        k3p     (1/ms)
        m
        tadj
}


BREAKPOINT {
        SOLVE ihkin METHOD sparse

        m = o1 + ginc * o2

        ih = gbar * m * (v - eh)
}

KINETIC ihkin {
:
:  Here k1ca and k3p are recalculated at each call to evaluate_fct
:  because Ca or p1 have to be taken at some power and this does
:  not work with the KINETIC block.
:  So the kinetics is actually equivalent to
:       c1 <-> o1
:       p0 + nca Cai <-> p1
:       o1 + nexp p1 <-> o2

        evaluate_fct(v,cai)

        ~ c1 <-> o1             (alpha,beta)

        ~ p0 <-> p1             (k1ca,k2)

        ~ o1 <-> o2             (k3p,k4)

        CONSERVE p0 + p1 = 1
        CONSERVE c1 + o1 + o2 = 1
}