Dendritic Impedance in Neocortical L5 PT neurons (Kelley et al. 2021)

 Download zip file   Auto-launch 
Help downloading and running models
Accession:266851
We simulated chirp current stimulation in the apical dendrites of 5 biophysically-detailed multi-compartment models of neocortical pyramidal tract neurons and found that a combination of HCN channels and TASK-like channels produced the best fit to experimental measurements of dendritic impedance. We then explored how HCN and TASK-like channels can shape the dendritic impedance as well as the voltage response to synaptic currents.
Reference:
1 . Kelley C, Dura-Bernal S, Neymotin SA, Antic SD, Carnevale NT, Migliore M, Lytton WW (2021) Effects of Ih and TASK-like shunting current on dendritic impedance in layer 5 pyramidal-tract neurons. J Neurophysiology 125:1501-1516 [PubMed]
Citations  Citation Browser
Model Information (Click on a link to find other models with that property)
Model Type: Neuron or other electrically excitable cell;
Brain Region(s)/Organism:
Cell Type(s): Neocortex L5/6 pyramidal GLU cell; Neocortex M1 L5B pyramidal pyramidal tract GLU cell;
Channel(s): I h; TASK channel;
Gap Junctions:
Receptor(s):
Gene(s):
Transmitter(s):
Simulation Environment: NEURON; Python; NetPyNE;
Model Concept(s): Impedance;
Implementer(s): Kelley, Craig;
Search NeuronDB for information about:  Neocortex L5/6 pyramidal GLU cell; Neocortex M1 L5B pyramidal pyramidal tract GLU cell; I h; TASK channel;
/
L5PYR_Resonance-master
models
Hay
mod
Ca_HVA.mod *
Ca_LVAst.mod *
CaDynamics_E2.mod *
epsp.mod *
h_migliore.mod *
Ih.mod *
Im.mod *
K_Pst.mod *
K_Tst.mod *
Nap_Et2.mod *
NaTa_t.mod *
NaTs2_t.mod *
SK_E2.mod *
SKv3_1.mod *
                            
: Dynamics that track inside calcium concentration
: modified from Destexhe et al. 1994

NEURON	{
	SUFFIX CaDynamics_E2
	USEION ca READ ica WRITE cai
	RANGE decay, gamma, minCai, depth
}

UNITS	{
	(mV) = (millivolt)
	(mA) = (milliamp)
	FARADAY = (faraday) (coulombs)
	(molar) = (1/liter)
	(mM) = (millimolar)
	(um)	= (micron)
}

PARAMETER	{
	gamma = 0.05 : percent of free calcium (not buffered)
	decay = 80 (ms) : rate of removal of calcium
	depth = 0.1 (um) : depth of shell
	minCai = 1e-4 (mM)
}

ASSIGNED	{ica (mA/cm2)}

STATE	{
	cai (mM)
	}

BREAKPOINT	{ SOLVE states METHOD cnexp }

DERIVATIVE states	{
	cai' = -(10000)*(ica*gamma/(2*FARADAY*depth)) - (cai - minCai)/decay
}