Response properties of neocort. neurons to temporally modulated noisy inputs (Koendgen et al. 2008)

 Download zip file 
Help downloading and running models
Accession:118631
Neocortical neurons are classified by current–frequency relationship. This is a static description and it may be inadequate to interpret neuronal responses to time-varying stimuli. Theoretical studies (Brunel et al., 2001; Fourcaud-Trocmé et al. 2003; Fourcaud-Trocmé and Brunel 2005; Naundorf et al. 2005) suggested that single-cell dynamical response properties are necessary to interpret ensemble responses to fast input transients. Further, it was shown that input-noise linearizes and boosts the response bandwidth, and that the interplay between the barrage of noisy synaptic currents and the spike-initiation mechanisms determine the dynamical properties of the firing rate. In order to allow a reader to explore such simulations, we prepared a simple NEURON implementation of the experiments performed in Köndgen et al., 2008 (see also Fourcaud-Trocmé al. 2003; Fourcaud-Trocmé and Brunel 2005). In addition, we provide sample MATLAB routines for exploring the sandwich model proposed in Köndgen et al., 2008, employing a simple frequdency-domain filtering. The simulations and the MATLAB routines are based on the linear response properties of layer 5 pyramidal cells estimated by injecting a superposition of a small-amplitude sinusoidal wave and a background noise, as in Köndgen et al., 2008.
References:
1 . Koendgen H, Geisler C, Wang XJ, Fusi S, Luescher HR, Giugliano M (2004) The dynamical response of single cells to noisy time-varying currents Soc Neurosci Abstr :640
2 . Köndgen H, Geisler C, Fusi S, Wang XJ, Lüscher HR, Giugliano M (2008) The dynamical response properties of neocortical neurons to temporally modulated noisy inputs in vitro. Cereb Cortex 18:2086-97 [PubMed]
Model Information (Click on a link to find other models with that property)
Model Type: Realistic Network; Axon;
Brain Region(s)/Organism: Neocortex;
Cell Type(s): Neocortex L5/6 pyramidal GLU cell; Abstract Wang-Buzsaki neuron;
Channel(s): I Na,t; I K;
Gap Junctions:
Receptor(s):
Gene(s):
Transmitter(s):
Simulation Environment: NEURON; MATLAB;
Model Concept(s): Parameter Fitting; Methods; Rate-coding model neurons;
Implementer(s): Giugliano, Michele [mgiugliano at gmail.com]; Delattre, Vincent;
Search NeuronDB for information about:  Neocortex L5/6 pyramidal GLU cell; I Na,t; I K;
/
KoendgenEtAl2008
mechanisms
Isinunoisy.mod
Isinunoisy2.mod
wb.mod
                            
TITLE SINUOISY current

COMMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sinusoidal + Fluctuating current model for temporally-modulated synaptic bombardment
    ====================================================================================

  The present version implements and generate a realization of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process
  (see Cox & Miller, 1969; see Tuckwell) to mimick the somatic impact of linearly adding EPSPs and
  IPSPs. Thus, it generates and injects in the specified neuronal compartment a fluctuating current
  waveform (a noise), characterized by a gauss-distributed amplitude, where neighboring amplitude 
  samples are by definition linearly correlated on a time scale set by the correlation time-length
  "tau" of the process.
 
  The numerical scheme for integration of OU processes takes advantage of the fact that these
  processes are gaussian, which led to an exact update rule independent of the time step dt..
  (see Gillespie DT, Am J Phys 64: 225, 1996):

  x(t+dt) = x(t) + (1. - exp(-dt/tau)) * (m - x) + sqrt(1.-exp(-2.*dt/tau)) * s * N(0,1)  
  where N(0,1) is a normal random number (avg=0, sigma=1)..

  Please note that only fixed integration time-step methods makes sense, since the stochastic current
  synthesized by the present mechanism is produced randomly and on-line. In other words, it is wrong to
  assume that neglecting the present integration step, reducing it and resynthesizing the current, lead
  to the same overall trajectory in the compartment output voltage.

  As opposed to the previously developed mechanisms Ifluct1.mod (see the ModelDB), here the STANDARD DEVIATION of the
  current is sinusoidally oscillating as indicated below, as a function of time: A * sin (2 pi f t ).

 IMPLEMENTATION

  This mechanism is implemented as a nonspecific current defined as a point process, mimicking a current-
  clamp stimulation protocol, injecting a sinusoidally oscillating waveform overlapped to a noisy component.
  
  I(t)  = m + x(t) * (A * sin (2 pi f t ) + s)

  Note: 
  Since this is an electrode current, positive values of i depolarize the cell and in the presence of the
  extracellular mechanism there will be a change in vext since i is not a transmembrane current but a current
  injected directly to the inside of the cell.
  
 REFERENCES

 Koendgen, H., Geisler, C., Fusi, S., Wang, X.-J., Luescher, H.-R., and Giugliano, M. (2007). 
 Arsiero, M., Luescher, H.-R., Lundstrom, B.N., and Giugliano, M. (2007). 
 La Camera, G., Rauch, A., Thurbon, D., Luescher, H.-R., Senn, W., and Fusi, S. (2006). 
 Giugliano, M., Darbon, P., Arsiero, M., Luescher, H.-R., and Streit, J. (2004). 
 Rauch, A., La Camera, G., Luescher, H.-R., Senn, W., and Fusi, S. (2003). 
 Boucsein, C. Tetzlaff, T., Meier, R., Aertsen, A., and B. Naundorf (2009)

 The present mechanism has been inspired by "Gfluct.mod", by A. Destexhe (1999), as taken from ModelDB.
 Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., Fellous, J-M. and Sejnowski, T.J. (2001). 

 AUTHORS
 M. Giugliano, Theoretical Neurobiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp
 		and Brain Mind Institute, EPFL Lausanne
  
 V. Delattre, Brain Mind Institute, EPFL Lausanne


 PARAMETERS

  The mechanism takes as input the following parameters (reported with their default values):

    m   = 0. (nA)       : DC offset of the overall current
    s   = 0.5 (nA)       : square root of the steady-state variance of the (noisy) stimulus component
    tau = 2. (ms)       : steady-state correlation time-length of the (noisy) stimulus component
    amp = 0. (nA)       : amplitude of the (sinusoidal) stimulus component
    freq= 0. (Hz)       : steady-state correlation time-length of the (noisy) stimulus component

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENDCOMMENT

INDEPENDENT {t FROM 0 TO 1 WITH 1 (ms)}

NEURON {
    POINT_PROCESS Isinunoisy2
    RANGE amp, i, freq, m, s, tau, x
    ELECTRODE_CURRENT i
}

UNITS {
    (nA) = (nanoamp)
}

PARAMETER {
    dt   (ms)
    m   = 0. (nA)       : DC offset of the overall current
    s   = 0.5 (nA)       : square root of the steady-state variance of the (noisy) stimulus component
    tau = 0. (ms)       : steady-state correlation time-length of the (noisy) stimulus component
    amp = 0. (nA)       : amplitude of the (sinusoidal) stimulus component
    freq= 0. (Hz)       : frequency of the sinusoidal input current 
    phas= 0. (HZ)       : phase of the sinusoidal input current
    fr2 = 0.(Hz)        : steady-state correlation time-length of the (noisy) stimulus component
}

ASSIGNED { 
    i (nA)              : overall sinusoidal noisy current
    x                   : state variable
}

INITIAL {
    i = m
    x = 0               : to reduce the transient, the state is set to its (expected) steady-state    
}

BREAKPOINT {  
    SOLVE oup
    
    if (tau <= 0) {  x =  normrand(0,1)  }
     
    :if (amp>s) { printf("ERROR..! amp: %f s: %f \n",amp,s) }
     i = x * (s + amp * sin(0.0062831853071795866 * freq * t)) + m

}


PROCEDURE oup() {       : uses "Scop" function normrand(mean, std_dev)
if (tau > 0) {  x = x + (1. - exp(-dt/tau)) * ( - x) + sqrt(1.-exp(-2.*dt/tau)) * normrand(0,1)}
}

PROCEDURE new_seed(seed) {      : procedure to set the seed
    set_seed(seed)
    VERBATIM
      printf("Setting random generator with seed = %g\n", _lseed);
    ENDVERBATIM
}


Loading data, please wait...